Therefore, In case the intent to cause injury is proven and it truly is further proven that inside the ordinary course of nature, that injury would lead to death, that matter has become objective plus the intention to kill (the main element that must
The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and utilize Section 302, emphasizing the importance of a fair and just legal system. It can be essential for society to understand the gravity of this offense along with the need for stringent punishment to prevent prospective offenders and assure justice for the victims and their families.
V) During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that hearth-arm injury which was fatal into the deceased was caused by the petitioner but in support of opinion from the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is out there over the file and mere ipsi dixit of police will not be binding over the Court.
maintaining the conviction awarded for the appellant reduce the sentence on the appellant from imprisonment for life to 1 already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)
very long period petitioner wasn't regarded as for promotion, meeting with the departmental promotion committee and think about the petitioner (Promotion)
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is additionally a well-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Any court may well seek to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to succeed in a different summary. The validity of such a distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to some higher court.
Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common legislation, can be a legislation that is based on precedents, that may be the judicial decisions from previous cases, instead than regulation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case legislation uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent as well as case under appeal, Possibly overruling the previous case legislation by setting a different precedent of higher authority. This may perhaps materialize several times given that the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first in the High Court of Justice, later with the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his growth with the concept of estoppel starting inside the High Trees case.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent could not be proved Except case is tried(Bail Matters)
147 . Const. click here P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi The petition regarding the upgraded post and fork out fixation are not entertainable for the reasons that such matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, plus the legal grounds for this petition are insufficient therefore this petition is dismissed, which includes disputed claims and counterclaims on the subject post, therefore this court is just not in a position to dilate upon these kinds of disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Read more
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and opportunity hazard to local residents. In the long run, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, although observing the general trend supports that electromagnetic fields have detrimental effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should adopt the precautionary principle set out during the 1992 Rio Declaration about the Environment and Growth, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The shortage of full scientific certainty should not be used like a reason to prevent environmental degradation.